Joey, The LSB test database says that mmap 29 is "Not In Use"; therefore, I don't understand why you are getting a failure.
http://www.freestandards.org/lsb/test/results/index.php?testcaseid=870 George (gk4) Joey Hess wrote: > > >From -IReturn-Receipt-To: > List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'm seeing mmap_P-29 fail in an ironic way: > > > ************************************************************************ > /tset/LSB.os/mfiles/mmap_P/T.mmap_P 29 Failed > > Test Information: > first mmap failed, errno = 12 (ENOMEM) > > > ************************************************************************ > > Of course the whole point of that test it to make sure the implementation > fails with ENOMEM if there is not enough room to mmap the requested space. > The testcase's pre-mapping of the space to try to fill up a bit of it so that > the second mmap will fail is here failing. > > I suspect that something else earlier in the mmap_P test is consuming some > space (would have to be near to half of the address space though) and not > freeing it or so. Has anyone else seen this testcase fail? > > -- > see shy jo > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- George Kraft IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
