Here's an interesting question.
I've just finished running the ia64 binary 1.2.0
test suites twice against the latest LSB-si for ia64
(it's the same build as was used for the ia32 results
generated last week, but I hadn't had time to test
this on Itanium).
Run #1 was with a 2.4.9 kernel that comes with the
distro, run #2 with a 2.4.18 stock kernel, with the
June patchset plus the "known" LSB patches applied.
#2 took care of 13 fails and unresolved observed with #1
(with no regressions).
Here's the question:
For both runs I have six fails in the LSB.os exec
tests, one each for exec, execle, execlp, execv,
execve and execvp, testcase 7, with this diagnostic:
************************************************************************
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execl_L 7 Failed
Test Information:
For ITIMER_REAL: it_interval.tv_usec reset incorrectly by exec:
expected value 10000; observed value 10736
For ITIMER_VIRTUAL: it_interval.tv_usec reset incorrectly by exec:
expected value 20000; observed value 20496
For ITIMER_PROF: it_interval.tv_usec reset incorrectly by exec:
expected value 30000; observed value 30256
The numbers are always the same - i.e., over two
runs I saw this same set of three "incorrect" values
12 times with no variation.
What should I read into this?
As an FYI, there's also a set of six unresolveds from the
same tests, in this case test case 1:
************************************************************************
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execl_L 1 Unresolved
Test Information:
deletion reason - unexpected child status
expected action: process exitted - exit code 1
observed action: signal 11 terminated process
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
