Issue #139 has been updated by R?my-Christophe Schermesser.
Jonathan Clarke wrote: > > Well, that's the same as current behaviour. But that sucks, because it's a > different config file from everything else, and it's obscure... so XML just > makes it more obscure. It'll work for a first version though. > > Is it possible to inject parameters programattically to logback (via > something.setConfiguration or addAppender, for example, like in log4j) ? Yes, we CAN !! But is it really a good idea ? It will be a lot of code, and not a very useful feature > > > Great! Looking forward to trying it :) Don't look to much for it, I will push *A* lot of revisions ;) ---------------------------------------- Feature #139: Migrate from log4j to sfl4j & LogBack http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/show/139 Author: R?my-Christophe Schermesser Status: New Priority: Low Assigned to: Category: Core Target version: 1.2 branch Log4j is no longer maintained, so we should migrate to the new standard sfl4j (api) and LogBack (implementation) -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://tools.lsc-project.org/my/account -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.lsc-project.org/pipermail/lsc-dev/attachments/20091106/3a7d8177/attachment-0001.htm>
