Hi Clement, Logs should be rotated. It is already achieved by logback with respect to the Java way, so logrotate is not necessary.
The better RPM package name would be "lsc" and yes one day there will probably be a lsc-webui. Thanks, -- Sebastien BAHLOUL IAM / Security specialist Ldap Synchronization Connector : http://lsc-project.org Blog : http://sbahloul.wordpress.com/ Le 2 avril 2012 18:24, Clément OUDOT <[email protected]> a écrit : > Le 2 avril 2012 18:19, Clément OUDOT <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Le 2 avril 2012 16:01, Sébastien Bahloul <[email protected]> > a écrit : > >> Hi Clement, > >> > >> Your involvement back in the LSC project is a great news ;) > >> > >> I started through the dist to : > >> - avoid depending on the overall build tools (Maven, ...) and > corresponding > >> test environments > >> - include all dependencies resolved by Maven > >> > >> Regarding the asynchronous mode, it's not available for all types of > >> sources, so I suggest providing both cron and init script and to let the > >> user chooses the way he wants to use. > >> > >> Java libraries should be in /usr/lib/java/lsc because they will probably > >> include duplicated files. > > > > > > I see in logback.xml that we already have log rotation. So do we > > really need logrotate script ? > > Other question, do you want to name the RPM "lsc" or "lsc-core" ? Do > we plan to release another RPM "lsc-webui" ? How would the second use > the first one ? > > Clément. > _______________________________________________________________ > Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org > > lsc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev >
_______________________________________________________________ Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org lsc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev
