Is there another tool you would recommend?   I work primarily in Windows
environments and previously used the free Identity Integration Feature Pack
from Microsoft for this purpose.  Unfortunately, that tool is no longer
supported on current Windows operating systems.

LSC seems like a very promising replacement for it.

Hugh

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Clément OUDOT <[email protected]>wrote:

> Le 24 avril 2012 18:07, Hugh Kelley <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > I am trying to use LSC to essentially "mirror" a very hierarchical (many
> > nested OUs) production LDAP instance into an isolated pre-production LDAP
> > instance.    My current issue is that the updates are being generated in
> > reverse (or perhaps random) order, so that child objects creations are
> > attempted before parent objects have been created.
> >
> > See the bottom of this post for an excerpt from my LDIF.   I know there
> is a
> > <sortedBy> option I can use at the connection level, but I don't know of
> any
> > LDAP attribute that could be used in a sort-by-depth manner.   Are there
> any
> > clever solutions for this?
> >
> > One ideaI am exploring is to sort by whenChanged, thinking that the
> > most-recently changed objects should be the children.   However, this
> > lsc.xml configuration appears to be invalid.
> >
> >     </ldapConnection>
> >         . . . . . .
> >       <binaryAttributes>
> >         <string>objectGUID</string>
> >       </binaryAttributes>
> >       <sortedBy>whenChanged</sortedBy>
> >     </ldapConnection>
> >
> > ERROR - org.lsc.exception.LscConfigurationException:
> > javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException
> >  - with linked exception:
> > [org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.d: Invalid content
> was
> > found starting with element 'sortedBy'. No child element is expected at
> this
> > point.]
> > org.lsc.exception.LscConfigurationException:
> > javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException
> >
>
>
> sortedBy option does not work in 2.0. An issue has been opened for the
> next version: http://tools.lsc-project.org/issues/440
>
>
> LSC is not a very good tool to synchronize a hierarchical tree, just
> for the reason you mention in your mail: entries are get in a non
> hierarchical order. Maybe someone in this list has done such
> synchronization and can help us?
>
>
> Clément.
>
_______________________________________________________________
Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org

lsc-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-users

Reply via email to