Le 03/04/2019 à 18:13, Jehan Procaccia a écrit : > in fact we are comparing between LSC and Talend for Data Integration > workflows
Hello, to complete Soisik answer, LSC is often compared to Talend. Talend is a very good product, with graphical interface, orchestrator and a lot of plugins. And we indeed do not manage workflows in LSC (you need to create tasks and a little script to chain them). You can see LSC as a small tool dedicated to LDAP directories (even if it also handles databases and other sources). I don't think Talend is able for example to behave like a syncrepl client to synchronize data on the fly (https://lsc-project.org/documentation/latest/configuration/service/sourceasyncldap), or manipulate Active Directory data l(see https://lsc-project.org/javadoc/2.1-SNAPSHOT/org/lsc/utils/directory/AD.html) I did not made bench recently, but in the past years, LSC was quite faster than a Talend connector. If performance matters for you, please compare execution time between the two products. Last point is the license model and cost model: LSC is a free software (BSD), you can use it without any constraint and if you need, you can get a support contract by several companies. Some of my customers use both Talend and LSC, depending on the use case. -- Clément Oudot | Identity Solutions Manager [email protected] Worteks | https://www.worteks.com _______________________________________________________________ Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org lsc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lsc-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lsc-users
