Hadn't considered RTG yet at all. Not sure which piece of the
puzzle they would claim responsibility for...
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Lou,
> I had looked at the IETF agenda yesterday while we were considering this
> presentation and your request for a swap of CCAMP and TEAS had already been
> fulfilled - https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html
> So, given that this BIER TE Framework presentation is also being presented in
> the BIER WG, IETF 101 attendees should have ample opportunity to consume it.
> I won't even suggest it be presented in the RTG WG... ;^)
> ???On 3/7/18, 6:20 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Lou Berger" <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on
> behalf of lber...@labn.net> wrote:
> FWIW TEAS, which clashes with LSR, is in the process of being swapped wth
> CCAMP. I expect this should be finalized today or tomorrow...
> On March 7, 2018 5:22:59 AM Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote:
> > Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> writes:
> >> Thanks, Acee - too bad.
> >> Very much a fan of creation of LSR. Sad that it meant moving from
> >> two underused WG meetings to one WG meeting that does not have enough
> >> time for new work. Reminds me of TSVWG. *sigh*
> > Well now that's not really fair, is it? This is our second meeting,
> > as LSR and we didn't run out of time in the initial joint session.
> > Given that apparently you need to present in TEAS first anyway it seems
> > like 102 is likely a better fit for an encoding presentation anyway.
> > fine with you requesting a time slot in 102 right now if you want. We
> > also put you on standby for 101 if we have any cancellations. :)
> > Thanks,
> > Chris.
> >> Well, i guess all i am left with is to ask LSR WG members to attend
> >> on monday and hope my request for slot there will be successful.
> >> on the proposed topology model is important for the design.
> >> Cheers
> >> Toerless
> >> P.S.: When are requests for slots LSR@IEF102 opening up ? ;-))
> >> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:44PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> >>> Hi Toerless,
> >>> Unfortunately, we have a very full agenda already and are not taking
> >>> additional presentation for IETF 101. Additionally, you're going to
> need to
> >>> present it in TEAS anyway due to their mandate...
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Acee
> >>> ???On 3/6/18, 4:56 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Toerless Eckert"
> >>> <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> >>> Dear LSR WG chairs,
> >>> I am hereby requesting a slot for LSR WG @IETF101 to present
> subject draft.
> >>> At the core of the proposed framework for the control plane of
> BIER-TE is
> >>> a proposed topology model for BIER-TE to allow path calculation
> (and other
> >>> consistency calculation) - distributed through the IGPs.
> >>> I would like to get early feedback before we would start to work
> on the
> >>> actual encoding of this topology information into IGP LSA/LSP
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Toerless
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Lsr mailing list
> >>> Lsr@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lsr mailing list
> > Lsr@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr mailing list
Lsr mailing list