Removed some recipients that I know are subscribed to the list anyway to avoid maximum,
I recommend this errata be accepted. The reference is clearly incorrect. Thanks, Acee On 3/14/18, 1:17 PM, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]> wrote: The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250, "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5287 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Angelos Vassiliou <[email protected]> Section: 7 Original Text ------------- inter-area procedures described in Section 6 of this document. Corrected Text -------------- inter-area procedures described in Section 5 of this document. Notes ----- Inter-Area Considerations are discussed in Section 5, not Section 6. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05) -------------------------------------- Title : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option Publication Date : July 2008 Author(s) : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
