Speaking a WG member:

I also support correcting this problem.

Thanks,
Acee

From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com>
Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 3:28 PM
To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric 
Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

Support (as co-author).

This correction is needed to insure that interoperability is assured.

    Les


From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:20 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric 
Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

This draft simply fixes a problem in RFC 7810 that resulted in an 
incompatibility issue with implementations. Given the simplicity of this 
document, I’d like to have an abbreviated WG adoption call of one week. Please 
indicate your support or objections to this document by April 17th, 2018.

Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to