Speaking a WG member: I also support correcting this problem.
Thanks, Acee From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com> Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 3:28 PM To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00 Support (as co-author). This correction is needed to insure that interoperability is assured. Les From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:20 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00 This draft simply fixes a problem in RFC 7810 that resulted in an incompatibility issue with implementations. Given the simplicity of this document, I’d like to have an abbreviated WG adoption call of one week. Please indicate your support or objections to this document by April 17th, 2018. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr