Hi, Here are some clarification questions about the flex-algo draft. 1. As described in section 5, in path computation for a flex-algorithm, the node firstly needs to prune the links not included for this flex-algorithm, then run SPF or other algorithm within the pruned topology. If a node supports multiple algorithms, does this mean the node needs to maintain multiple pruned topologies? 2. If one path computed in algorithm-1 with latency metric and another path computed in algorithm-2 with bandwidth metric traverse the same link(s) in the network, can the latency or bandwidth SLA be guaranteed for the service? Or the path may need to be re-computed and adjusted to another link to avoid potential performance degradation?
ZhiBo Hu 发件人: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee) 发送时间: 2018年4月17日 22:44 收件人: lsr@ietf.org 主题: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts This begins a two-week adoption poll for the following Flex Algorithm drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ppsenak-ospf-sr-flex-algo/ The adoption poll will end at 12:00 AM EST on May 2nd, 2018. Please indicate your support of opposition of the drafts. Additionally, the authors are amenable to combining the drafts into a single draft. If you have an opinion, please state that as well. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
