Note that since this correction is pretty straightforward, our intension is to
start the WG last call at the end of next week.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 3:16 PM
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org"
<lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE)
Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
Hi Les,
Yes – please reissue the draft using the agreed upon naming convention.
Thanks,
Acee
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 2:37 PM
To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric
Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
WG chairs –
It has been more than 2 weeks since adoption call was initiated and support has
been expressed on the list – w no objections.
Can we consider WG adoption complete?
Can I issue a WG version of the draft?
Thanx.
Les
From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:20 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric
Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
This draft simply fixes a problem in RFC 7810 that resulted in an
incompatibility issue with implementations. Given the simplicity of this
document, I’d like to have an abbreviated WG adoption call of one week. Please
indicate your support or objections to this document by April 17th, 2018.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
