Speaking as WG member, I support publication of the subject document. I have the following comments:
1. The normative text saying that the TLV MUST be included needs to be changed from section 3.1. I’m sure you didn’t mean this since LLS itself isn’t mandatory and this isn’t backward compatible. 2. Add a reference to RFC 8379 to section 2 or a new section indicating that this mechanism suffers from many of the same shortcomings as using OSPF TE LSAs. 3. Remove RFC 5340 from the references as it is not referenced. I’m also send a couple editorial suggestions off list. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Monday, June 18, 2018 at 12:07 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org> Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02 This begins an LSR WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, July 3rd, 2018. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
