Thanks. We have the BGP-LS work stuck until this is resolved and OSPF/ISIS IANA code points are correctly updated. Would appreciate a fast update to align the language so the draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-rld can be progressed in parallel.
G/ From: Lsr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ???(??) Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 02:45 To: Lsr <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts Hi Acee, We will update these two drafts so as to keep the terminologies be aligned with the https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12.txt Best regards, Xiaohu ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Send Time:2018年7月18日(星期三) 05:13 To:[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc:[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject:[Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts Authors of LSR MPLS ELC Signaling Drafts, Now that we have https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12.txt on the RFC queue waiting on a MISREF for Segment Routing MPLS, it seems we should move forward with these drafts. However, it seems that we should advertise an Entropy RLD rather than a generic RLD to be aligned with the terminology in the MPLS draft (soon to be RFC). Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
