+1 Tony

We could start with a document, similar to dc-routing requirements one we did 
in RTGWG before chartering RIFT and LSVR.
Would help to disambiguate requirements from claims and have apple to apple 
comparison.
Doing it on github was a good experience.


Regards,
Jeff

> On Aug 22, 2018, at 09:27, Tony Li <tony1ath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> At IETF 102, there was no dearth of flooding reduction proposals.  In fact, 
>> we have so many proposals that there wasn’t agree as how to move forward and 
>> we agreed to discuss on the list. This Email is to initiate that discussion 
>> (which I intend to participate in but as a WG member). 
> 
> 
> Hi Acee,
> 
> Perhaps a useful starting point of the discussion is to talk about 
> requirements.  There seem to many different perceptions.
> 
> Regards,
> Tony
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to