+1 Tony We could start with a document, similar to dc-routing requirements one we did in RTGWG before chartering RIFT and LSVR. Would help to disambiguate requirements from claims and have apple to apple comparison. Doing it on github was a good experience.
Regards, Jeff > On Aug 22, 2018, at 09:27, Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> At IETF 102, there was no dearth of flooding reduction proposals. In fact, >> we have so many proposals that there wasn’t agree as how to move forward and >> we agreed to discuss on the list. This Email is to initiate that discussion >> (which I intend to participate in but as a WG member). > > > Hi Acee, > > Perhaps a useful starting point of the discussion is to talk about > requirements. There seem to many different perceptions. > > Regards, > Tony > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
