Hi Qin,
On 8/23/18, 11:03 PM, "Qin Wu" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, Folks:
draft-wu-pce-discovery-pceps-support-07 has been resubmitted to LSR as
draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00 based on Chairs' suggestion.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00
This draft define IGP extension for PCEP security support,
1.TCP AO which has been published as RFC5295.
2.PCEP over TLS which has been published as RFC8253 recently.
One issue raised by chair is shared key support for TCP-AO, how do you get
shared key?
I guess my point was is that if you are distributing shared keys, you probably
know whether or not TCP-AO is supported. Having said that, possibly the draft
should include some sort of key-id for TCP-AO or TLS usage. For example, the
key-chain name from RFC 8177. We don't need to decide now.
Thanks,
Acee
we believe to support TCP-AO, RFC5296 should also be implemented, which
provide PSK and associated ciphersuit.
Let us know if you have any other opinion?
-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2018年8月24日 10:57
收件人: Daniel King; wangzitao; Dhruv Dhody; wangzitao; Diego R. Lopez; Diego
Lopez; Qin Wu
主题: New Version Notification for
draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Qin Wu and posted to the IETF repository.
Name: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support
Revision: 00
Title: IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in
the PCE discovery
Document date: 2018-08-23
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 6
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support
Abstract:
When a Path Computation Element (PCE) is a Label Switching Router
(LSR) participating in the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), or even a
server participating in IGP, its presence and path computation
capabilities can be advertised using IGP flooding. The IGP
extensions for PCE discovery (RFC 5088 and RFC 5089) define a method
to advertise path computation capabilities using IGP flooding for
OSPF and IS-IS respectively. However these specifications lack a
method to advertise PCEP security (e.g., Transport Layer
Security(TLS),TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO)) support capability.
This document proposes new capability flag bits for PCE-CAP-FLAGS
sub-TLV that can be announced as attribute in the IGP advertisement
to distribute PCEP security support information.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
