Les, I think that Tony's draft already has a pretty good set of requirements: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05#section-3
Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 12:17 PM > To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>; tony...@tony.li > Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Acee Lindem > (acee) <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward > > Building on what Tony L and Peter have already stated: > > R1: Significant reduction in flooding overhead. > > R2: Flooding reduction should not add significant delay to the flooding time > > R3: Reliability of flooding MUST be maintained > > Les > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 9:09 AM > > To: tony...@tony.li > > Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Acee Lindem > > (acee) <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> > > Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > On 24/08/18 17:03 , tony...@tony.li wrote: > > > > > > So, going Old Skool here: > > > > > > Since everyone agrees that this is a reasonable direction, how about > > > we > > have a real discussion on the list? > > > > > > Requirement number 1 is straightforward: a significant reduction in > > flooding overhead. > > > > > > The basis for this requirement is the understanding that in a dense > > topology, there is a great deal of redundancy due to flooding, and > > that it is this redundancy that supersaturates the control plane. > > > > > > Do we agree on this? > > > > absolutely. > > > > I would add that the flooding reduction should not add significant > > delay to the flooding time compared to the regular flooding case. > > > > thanks, > > Peter > > > > > > > > Tony > > > > > > . > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lsr mailing list > > Lsr@ietf.org > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail > > man_listinfo_lsr&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoC > > I&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH- > s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=ksaqjl1oSFzKbtFY0O-H > > > pMKmAew2h7RmW26uh_BWPrI&s=oGOlkQBdmIFrb8WdCaV7eez4KrIYUjN4 > D08UMlzOPcU& > > e= > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_lsr&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbf > h0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH- > s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=ksaqjl1oSFzKbtFY0O- > HpMKmAew2h7RmW26uh_BWPrI&s=oGOlkQBdmIFrb8WdCaV7eez4KrIYUjN > 4D08UMlzOPcU&e= _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr