Les,

I think that Tony's draft already has a pretty good set of requirements:  
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05#section-3

Yours Irrespectively,

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 12:17 PM
> To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>; tony...@tony.li
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Acee Lindem
> (acee) <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
> 
> Building on what Tony L and Peter have already stated:
> 
> R1: Significant reduction in flooding overhead.
> 
> R2: Flooding reduction should not add significant delay to the flooding time
> 
> R3: Reliability of flooding MUST be maintained
> 
>    Les
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 9:09 AM
> > To: tony...@tony.li
> > Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Acee Lindem
> > (acee) <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
> >
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > On 24/08/18 17:03 , tony...@tony.li wrote:
> > >
> > > So, going Old Skool here:
> > >
> > > Since everyone agrees that this is a reasonable direction, how about
> > > we
> > have a real discussion on the list?
> > >
> > > Requirement number 1 is straightforward: a significant reduction in
> > flooding overhead.
> > >
> > > The basis for this requirement is the understanding that in a dense
> > topology, there is a great deal of redundancy due to flooding, and
> > that it is this redundancy that supersaturates the control plane.
> > >
> > > Do we agree on this?
> >
> > absolutely.
> >
> > I would add that the flooding reduction should not add significant
> > delay to the flooding time compared to the regular flooding case.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lsr mailing list
> > Lsr@ietf.org
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail
> > man_listinfo_lsr&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoC
> > I&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-
> s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=ksaqjl1oSFzKbtFY0O-H
> >
> pMKmAew2h7RmW26uh_BWPrI&s=oGOlkQBdmIFrb8WdCaV7eez4KrIYUjN4
> D08UMlzOPcU&
> > e=
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_lsr&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbf
> h0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-
> s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=ksaqjl1oSFzKbtFY0O-
> HpMKmAew2h7RmW26uh_BWPrI&s=oGOlkQBdmIFrb8WdCaV7eez4KrIYUjN
> 4D08UMlzOPcU&e=

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to