Hi Jeff, Thanks for the prompt response and update.
The current draft addresses all the issues I raised. Cheers, Tal. On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:42 PM Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tal, > > > > Many thanks for your comments. > > Updated draft has been published for your review. > > > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > > *From: *Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]> > *Date: *Monday, August 20, 2018 at 23:45 > *To: *<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > *Cc: *<[email protected]>, "Yemin (Amy)" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd > *Resent-From: *<[email protected]> > *Resent-To: *Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>, < > [email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > *Resent-Date: *Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:45:53 -0700 (PDT) > > > > Hello, > > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. > The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related > drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes > on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to > the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please > see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir > > Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it > would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last > Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through > discussion or by updating the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd > Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi > Review Date: 21-Aug-2018 > Intended Status: Standards Track > > *Summary:* > > This document is basically ready for publication, but has a couple of > minor issues and nits that should be resolved prior to publication. > > *Minor Issues:* > > - Figure 1 seems to indicate that the MSD-Type and the MSD-Value are 2 > octets long each, whereas according to the text afterwards each of the two > fields is 1 octet long. > - Figure 2 – same comment. > > *Nits:* > > - “provisioned..” --> “provisioned.” (extra period) > - “Acknowledgements” --> “Acknowledgments” > - “capabilites” --> “capabilities” > - “the the” --> “the” > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
