Dear lsr WG: As you may have noticed, IPR disclosures were filed on August 13 for these two documents — very late in the process, given that both documents had already been sent to the IESG for publication.
Regardless of the timing, the statements don’t represent additional disclosures. Instead, they provide clarifications and correct a clerical mistake. As a whole, the information is the same as what has originally presented. Please see my analysis below. I have no concerns with the contents of these disclosures. If anyone has concerns, please reply to this message by the end of next week (Sep/7). Thanks! Alvaro. *Analysis* (0) The notes below contain information that first refers to draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd, and then to draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd. (1) On July 20, 2017, disclosures with IDs 3037 [1] and 3040 [2] were filed.. (2) In these declarations, the Patent Holder points at Application numbers 62/295453, 62/295454, respectively. (3) On August 13, 2018, disclosures with IDs 3255 [3] and 3254 [4] were filed. (4) In these new declarations, the Patent Holder clarifies that the corresponding Application numbers should be 62/295454 for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd, and 62/295453 for draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd. Conclusion: the new declarations correct the initial Application numbers provided. Those applications had already been considered by the OSPF and ISIS WGs. The licensing terms didn’t change. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3037/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3040/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3255/ [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3254/
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
