Les, Acee, Alvaro, diffs looks ok to me.
s. > On Aug 31, 2018, at 7:56 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7810, > "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5486 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Teresa <[email protected]> > > Section: 4.6 > > Original Text > ------------- > Available Bandwidth: This field carries the available bandwidth on a > link, forwarding adjacency, or bundled link in IEEE floating-point > format with units of bytes per second. For a link or forwarding > adjacency, available bandwidth is defined to be residual bandwidth > (see Section 4.5) minus the measured bandwidth used for the actual > forwarding of non-RSVP-TE label switched path packets. For a bundled > link, available bandwidth is defined to be the sum of the component > link available bandwidths minus the measured bandwidth used for the > actual forwarding of non-RSVP-TE label switched path packets. For a > bundled link, available bandwidth is defined to be the sum of the > component link available bandwidths. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Available Bandwidth: This field carries the available bandwidth on a > link, forwarding adjacency, or bundled link in IEEE floating-point > format with units of bytes per second. For a link or forwarding > adjacency, available bandwidth is defined to be residual bandwidth > (see Section 4.5) minus the measured bandwidth used for the actual > forwarding of non-RSVP-TE label switched path packets. For a bundled > link, available bandwidth is defined to be the sum of the component > link (residual) bandwidths minus the measured bandwidth used for the > actual forwarding of non-RSVP-TE label switched path packets.For a > bundled link, available bandwidth is defined to be the sum of the > component link available bandwidths. > > Notes > ----- > Two sentences to explain 'available bandwidth' on a bundled link, but one > says "sum of component available bandwidth minus xxx", the other says "sum of > component available bandwidth", is conflicting. need to change the first > sentence to 'sum of component residual bandwidth minus xxx' > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7810 (draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-11) > -------------------------------------- > Title : IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions > Publication Date : May 2016 > Author(s) : S. Previdi, Ed., S. Giacalone, D. Ward, J. Drake, Q. Wu > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : IS-IS for IP Internets > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
