This is indeed an absolutely not critical comment. Please address it whenever you feel is appropriate.
-m Le 2018-10-25 à 11:54, Acee Lindem (acee) a écrit : > Hi Peter, Martin, > We can address these comments after the draft is IESG approved and on the RFC > Editor queue as long as they don't change the normative specifications. I'm > hoping this simple and draft which has an existing implementation will be > approved. > Thanks, > Acee > > On 10/25/18, 4:54 AM, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppse...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > I have addressed your comment, bu I'm unable to publish the updated > version at this point as the submission is closed till November 3rd. > > thanks, > Peter > > > On 23/10/18 11:15 , Martin Vigoureux wrote: > > Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Hello, > > > > thank you for this document. I have only one comment which is picking > up a typo: > > > > s/a way to advertise and use and use them for Generalized Multi-/a way > to > > advertise and use them for Generalized Multi-/ > > > > > > . > > > > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr