Hi Ben,
On 10/25/18, 8:22 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" <[email protected]> wrote:
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sending a new type of information to the peer usually involves a privacy
considerations analysis. I don't expect there to be anything worrisome
here, but some text in the document indicating that the analysis has been
done would be reassuring.
Can you suggest some text? I was thinking:
Since the scope of the interface ID is limited to the advertising OSPF
router
uniquely identifying links, there are no privacy concerns associated with its
advertisement.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
