> Am 03.12.2018 um 16:01 schrieb Peter Psenak <[email protected]>: > >> Minor comments: >> 1) In intro: "...while an adjacency segment, in >> most cases, is a one-hop path." >> Is that true, that in _most_ cases it is one hop? > > the text is referring to adjacency segment, which is local and only > programmed on the node where the adjacency exists and its path is > representing the path to the adjacent neighbor. This is contrary to prefix > segment, which is global and programmed on all routers, so can represent a > multi-hop path.
Ah, wasn’t really aware that adjacency segment is a well-defined term here. Thanks! Mirja _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
