Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the TSV-ART review (Thanks Yoshi!) and the information provided in the shepherd write-up, I understand that this document intends to "fix" a specific errata. However, there are IPPM RFCs for each of these metrics that provide further insights on how the calculate them correctly, e.g. rfc3393 IP Packet Delay Variation. I will not block publication on this doc but I would still welcome and recommend if the respective references could be added to provide at least some guidance instead of just declaring calculation out of scope. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
