Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The nice tidy diff against RFC 7810 and description in Appendix A made this document very easy to review; thank you! That said, I think that there are some lingering factual errors that will require some text changes; in particular, relating to the IANA registrations. E.g,. Section 2 shouldn't say "this document registers new IS-IS TE sub-TLVs" and "this document registers several sub-TLVs", since the sub-TLVs are not new. Similarly, one could make a case that the IANA considerations should request for IANA to update the registrations for the indicated sub-TLVs to point to this document instead of RFC 7810. (I'm still balloting No Objection and not Discuss, because I trust the responsible AD to make the right thing happen.) _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
