Hi Jonathan, Thanks for your interest and engagement. Acee From: Jonathan Natale <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 9:09 AM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> Cc: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Deborah Brungard <[email protected]>, Alvaro Retana <[email protected]>, Martin Vigoureux <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2328 (5684)
Thanks for the prompt reply, Acee. I think that answers my confusion; please close the errata. Sorry for the noise. On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 7:14 AM Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Jonathan, I don't see that there is a problem here. In the case where routers on the multi-access network are declaring themselves BDR, only those routers are included in the election process. In the case where there aren't any, all routers are included. I recommend this errata be rejected. Thanks, Acee On 4/4/19, 7:00 AM, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328, "OSPF Version 2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5684 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: jonathan natale <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Section: 9.4 Original Text ------------- These two alternatives (~=">=1 BDRs" vs. ~="no BDRs") seem (to me at least, maybe I missed the point) to have the same outcome (~="highest becomes BDR")--please clarify it: If one or more of these routers have declared themselves Backup Designated Router[alternative1] (i.e., they are currently listing themselves as Backup Designated Router, but not as Designated Router, in their Hello Packets) the one having highest Router Priority is declared to be Backup Designated Router. In case of a tie, the one having the highest Router ID is chosen. If no routers have declared themselves Backup Designated Router[alternative2], Moy Standards Track [Page 75] RFC 2328 OSPF Version 2 April 1998 choose the router having highest Router Priority, (again excluding those routers who have declared themselves Designated Router), and again use the Router ID to break ties. Corrected Text -------------- TBD Notes ----- It is unclear to me if a BDR should get preempted (I know the BDR should not). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC2328 (no draft string recorded) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPF Version 2 Publication Date : April 1998 Author(s) : J. Moy Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG -- Jonathan Natale Technical Solutions Engineer - Arista Networks (NAR) Direct line: 603 686-8518 or 408 547 5500 x68518 9am to 5pm EDT (GMT-4) Toll-free support line: +1 866 476 0000 (US), +44 808 234 0722 (UK) International support line: +1 408 547 5502 or +44 207 023 9352 Please call support if immediate assistance is required. If you have feedback or concerns at any point during the course of this case, please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
