Agreed – need a better title. IS-IS has been supporting routing over the IPv6 
data plane since RFC 5308 šŸ˜‰ I’m surprised nobody (including myself) noticed 
this before.
Acee

From: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 3:33 PM
To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support 
Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

Isn't the draft's name a bit misleading ?

"IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane"

I think ISIS supports routing over IPv6 for some time now :) Maybe it would be 
better to s/Support/Segment/ ?

In any case I support the adoption.

Thx,
R.

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:50 PM Acee Lindem (acee) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We been holding off WG adoption until the base SRv6 draft was adopted in 
SPRING. Now that 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming/ 
has been adopted, we are starting a two week LSR WG adoption poll for the 
subject draft. Please register your support or objection prior to 12:00 AM UTC, 
on May 25th, 2019.

For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

Thanks,
Acee

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to