Hi all, This update:
- Fixes a bug in how LAN IIHs were being handled. In fact, we do need one PDU per level. - Added support for flooding scopes. - Welcomes Les and Paul Wells as co-authors. Questions and comments to the list, please. Tony > Begin forwarded message: > > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01.txt > Date: June 5, 2019 at 1:13:07 PM PDT > To: "Paul Wells" <pauwe...@cisco.com>, "Tony Li" <tony...@tony.li>, "Les > Ginsberg" <ginsb...@cisco.com> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis > Revision: 01 > Title: Hierarchical IS-IS > Document date: 2019-06-05 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 9 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis/ > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01 > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01 > > Abstract: > The IS-IS routing protocol was originally defined with a two level > hierarchical structure. This was adequate for the networks at the > time. As we continue to expand the scale of our networks, it is > apparent that additional hierarchy would be a welcome degree of > flexibility in network design. > > This document defines IS-IS Levels 3 through 8. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
