Hi Stefan,
On 7/15/19, 5:51 AM, "Stefan Santesson via Datatracker" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Reviewer: Stefan Santesson
Review result: Has Nits
This document seems to have a reasonable security considerations section.
As a nit, I notice that the abbreviation OSPF is not written out or
explained
at all in this document. One should hope that most people that find their
way
to this document are familiar with OSPF, but I still believe that is is
appropriate for all IETF RFC to write out and briefly explain/reference
abbreviations.
Note that OSPF is in the list of abbreviations that don't require expansion -
https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt
In fact, OSPF had its own WG for more than 20 years __ We only combined OSPF
and IS-IS into LSR less than 2 years back.
Thanks,
Acee
In summary this document seems well written
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
