Hi Alissa,
On 8/21/19, 9:29 AM, "Alissa Cooper via Datatracker" <[email protected]> wrote:
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Per the Gen-ART review, I think 2.3 may be a little clearer if it were to
say
"The field 'version' is used to indicate the OSPF LSA version and is
mandatory."
This change has already been made in response to the Gen-ART review.
2.3. OSPFv2 and OSPFv3
The data model defined herein supports both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
The field 'version' is used to indicate the OSPF version and is
mandatory. Based on the configured version, the data model varies to
accommodate the differences between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
Thanks,
Acee
I did not review this entire document but I'm balloting based on the Gen-ART
review.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
