Hi Les, I think the question is whether there can be a single RLD depth MSD rather than a RLD solely for entropy label discovery. Thanks, Acee
From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:29 PM To: Uma Chunduri <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07 Uma – Please read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12#section-4 In short, we do not assume that EL Load Balancing can be performed for generic MSD. Thanx. Les From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 11:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07 Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR has to be entropy label specific ? IOW can we just modify this as “readable label depth” as opposed to “entropy readable label depth” ? This would allow any other special purpose label inserted in the stack and would be at par with current MSD type “Base MPLS Imposition MSD” ( https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml ). -- Uma C.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
