Speaking a WG member: I support publication. I have the same comments as the OSPF ELC draft.
1. There are a couple instances of “Signalling” here too. 2. Why does this referred to stacked LSPs? I think it could be applicable to a single LSP. 3. In the “Security Considerations”, please say the considerations of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 are also applicable. Thanks, Acee From: mpls <mpls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com> Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:45 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org> Cc: "m...@ietf.org" <m...@ietf.org>, "lsr-...@ietf.org" <lsr-...@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-...@ietf.org> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07 We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the RFC editor’s queue. This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on Sept 14th, 2014. Also, review comments are certainly welcome. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr