Speaking a WG member:

I support publication. I have the same comments as the OSPF ELC draft.


  1.  There are a couple instances of “Signalling” here too.
  2.  Why does this referred to stacked LSPs? I think it could be applicable to 
a single LSP.
  3.  In the “Security Considerations”, please say the considerations of 
draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 are also applicable.

Thanks,
Acee

From: mpls <[email protected]> on behalf of Acee Lindem <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:45 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability 
and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe 
they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy 
Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the 
RFC editor’s queue.
This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your 
support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on Sept 14th, 2014. 
Also, review comments are certainly welcome.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to