On September 26, 2019 at 1:37:47 AM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker ( [email protected]) wrote:
Acee: Hi! — Section 2.3 — In the last two paragraphs of the section, one uses “should” advertise and the other uses “SHOULD” advertise. They should either both be BCP 14 key words, or both not. In this case, instead of the change to “SHOULD” (which you made in -38), we need to go the other way: s/SHOULD/should This is from my AD review: - - - - .... 506 If an implementation does not support per level configuration for a 507 parameter modeled with per level configuration, the implementation 508 SHOULD advertise a deviation to announce the non-support of the 509 level-1 and level-2 containers. 511 Finally, if an implementation supports per level configuration but 512 does not support the level-1-2 configuration, it SHOULD also 513 advertise a deviation. [major] "SHOULD advertise a deviation" According to rfc7950: "Deviations MUST never be part of a published standard"; I realize that this document doesn't include one, but it Normatively recommends their use. s/SHOULD/should - - - - I missed in -36 the fact that only the first SHOULD was changed. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
