Hi Tom,
I agree with your comments. I'm going to start a WG adoption poll on this
document as it is pretty straight-forward. See one inline.
On 11/24/19, 2:44 AM, "Lsr on behalf of tom petch" <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on
behalf of ie...@btconnect.com> wrote:
Christian
Some stray thoughts
/intermediate system routeing/intermediate system routing/
since we have to use the American style:-(
We sometimes violate this rule if it is a direct reference to an ISO document
of a text lifted directly from ISO specification. However, the two instances
are not so I'd recommend, "Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS)
routing" for both references.
Thanks,
Acee
import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; }
lacks a reference clause and the reference should be in the Normative
References
import ietf-isis { prefix "isis"; }
lacks a reference clause
IS-IS reverse metric functionality [RFC8500].
YANG module must be plain text and this looks like it is not.
Tom Petch
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
