Support +1 obviously 

--- tony 

On 1/2/20, 11:35 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com> wrote:

    As co-author, I obviously support moving the draft forward.
    
    The impetus for writing the draft was a real world interoperability problem 
- so there should be no debate about whether the draft is needed.
    All parties involved in the problem have actively participated in writing 
the draft - so I think we can be confident that we have appropriately addressed 
the related issues.
    
       Les
    
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
    > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2020 11:07 AM
    > To: lsr@ietf.org
    > Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org>; Antoni
    > Przygienda <p...@juniper.net>
    > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv
    > 
    > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Jan 16th, 2020, for 
draft-ietf-
    > lsr-isis-invalid-tlv.
    > 
    >   
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Xqr-8QUzi2w5xHSiBoC1-Cb1CiQk8b_C9wiUKST8PRGbEfHsUpZJh2XnuuxB2Q$
 
    > 
    > Tony P (other authors already responded during the adoption poll), please
    > indicate your knowledge of any IPR related to this work to the list as 
well.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Chris & Acee.
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Lsr mailing list
    > Lsr@ietf.org
    > 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Xqr-8QUzi2w5xHSiBoC1-Cb1CiQk8b_C9wiUKST8PRGbEfHsUpZJh2XJ7B9p_w$
 
    

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to