Hi Yali, 

Thanks for the quick turn around with the version incorporating my comments. 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisement/

This is the organization of draft that I had in mind. It may need some more 
references to 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/ but that can 
come if the work progresses in OPSAWG.  Also, I was surprised not to see more 
discussion of the identifiers and name spaces in the base framework document. 

Thanks,
Acee 

On 3/16/20, 3:52 AM, "wangyali" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Dear Acee,
    
    Many thanks for your comments. Taking your suggestion I am writing a new 
LSR draft to combine the OSPF draft, ISIS draft and BGP-LS draft and will add 
more context on how to use the IFIT Capability information.
    
    Best regards,
    Yali
    
    -----邮件原件-----
    发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email protected]] 
    发送时间: 2020年3月15日 2:18
    收件人: wangyali <[email protected]>; [email protected]
    抄送: IDR List <[email protected]>
    主题: Re: 答复: [Lsr] New Version Notification for 
draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02
    
    Hi Yali,
    Please add some more context to the draft as to how the information will be 
used. I say draft rather than drafts since you can really combine the OSPF 
draft, IS-IS draft, and BGP-LS draft into a single LSR document. For RFC 8379, 
we included the BGP-LS specification in the OSPF draft and the IDR chairs have 
agreed to this for simple encodings such as this one.  
    Thanks,
    Acee
    
    On 3/10/20, 4:46 AM, "wangyali" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
        Dear Acee,
        
        Thanks a lot for your comments. I have revised the title of drafts and 
will take your suggestion to add more text on how to use the IFIT Capability 
information, once the submission is opened. Here is my quick reply:
        
        IFIT is deployed in a specific domain referred as the IFIT domain. One 
network domain may consists of multiple IFIT domain. Within the IFIT domain, 
one or more IFIT-options are added into packet at the IFIT-enabled head node 
that is referred to as the “IFIT encapsulating node”. Then IFIT data fields MAY 
be updated by IFIT transit nodes that the packet traverses. Finally, the data 
fields are removed at a device that is referred to as the “IFIT decapsulating 
node”. 
        
        The IFIT data fields must not leak to other domains. So, the IFIT 
encapsulating node need to know if the decapsulating node is able to support 
the IFIT capability. So that it can decide whether to add the IFIT-option or 
not.
        
        The solution is similar to RFC8491. We use IGP to advertise the 
capability, so that head node can use. By using BGP-LS, a centralized 
controller can also learn the IFIT Capability of nodes to determine whether a 
particular IFIT Option type can be supported in a given network.
        
        Best regards,
        Yali
        
        -----邮件原件-----
        发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email protected]] 
        发送时间: 2020年3月9日 18:30
        收件人: wangyali <[email protected]>; [email protected]
        主题: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for 
draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02
        
        Hi Yali,
        
        A couple of very basic comments on these drafts. They are definitely 
not ready for consideration. 
        
            1. IFIT is never expanded as an acronym. Seems it should be as 
early as the title. 
        
                  OSPF extensions for Advertising In-Situ Flow Information 
Telemetry (IFIT) Capability
        
           2. You probably could come up with a more succinct acronym for IFIT. 
        
           3. The has no specification of how the capabilities are used. Are 
they purely informational? 
        
        Thanks,
        Acee
        
         
        
        
        On 3/9/20, 4:33 AM, "Lsr on behalf of wangyali" <[email protected] 
on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
        
            Dear all,
            
            I'm Yali. Following is a new version of I-D, 
draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02 I submitted recently.
            
            Please let me know your questions and comments. Thank you.
            
            >>>>>>>>>>>
            Name:               draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability
            Revision:   02
            Title:              Extensions to OSPF for Advertising IFIT Node 
Capability
            Document date:      2020-03-09
            Group:              Individual Submission
            Pages:              7
            URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02.txt
            Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability/
            Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02
            Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability
            Diff:           
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02
            
            Abstract:
               This document defines a way for an Open Shortest Path First 
(OSPF)
               router originating the RI LSA to announce IFIT node capabilities
               within the entire routing domain.  A new optional TLV is 
extended to
               the OSPF RI Opaque LSA [RFC7770] to carry the IFIT node 
capability
               information.  Such advertisements enable IFIT applications in an
               operational network domain.  Here, the term "OSPF" includes both
               OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
            
            Best regards,
            Yali WANG
            _______________________________________________
            Lsr mailing list
            [email protected]
            https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
            
        
        
    
    

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to