Hi Acee, Do you think that it would be helpful to have an informative reference to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1? And possibly a comment somewhere in the draft to specify where the manageability model will be specified?
The same comment obviously applies to the OSPF draft also ... Regards, Rob -----Original Message----- From: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> Sent: 19 May 2020 12:17 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT) Hi Rob, On 5/19/20, 6:00 AM, "Robert Wilton via Datatracker" <[email protected]> wrote: Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Same comment as for equivalent OSPF draft. Is there any associated YANG module required to manage this protocol enhancement? If so, is that already being worked or, or planned work for the WG? We will add the necessary IS-IS encodings to this module - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1/ Thanks, Acee Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
