Hi Roman,
On 20/05/2020 00:01, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two editorial nits:
** Section 3. Editorial. s/ When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS
levels ([RFC5302],/When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS levels
[RFC5302],/
I must be missing something, but what's the diff between the original
and proposed text?
** Section 4. Figure 2. The text says that “A MSD-Type Code 2 has been
assigned by IANA”, but Figure 2 says “MSD-Type=TBD2”.
the figure 2 has been removed based on the previous comments.
thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
