Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-te-app-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- An easy one: Sections 7.3 and 7.5 create new IANA registries with "Expert Review" rules, but Section 7.5 provides no particular guidance to the Designated Expert about how to review applications, as required by Section 4.5 of BCP 26. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Since this document is in many parts a copy of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse, I'm only reviewing this delta between them here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14&url2=draft-ietf-isis-te-app-14 Section 2: * "... expected to continue - so any discussion ..." -- change to "... expected to continue. Therefore, any discussion ..." * "... key points identified in the introduction - which are:" -- change hyphen to a comma Section 3: * "... advertisements include sub-TLVs for TLVs ..." -- Please define or expand "TLV" on first use. * Please just name the registries, rather than giving multi-line URLs to them. Section 3.1: * As with the matching OSPF document, I don't see the benefit of citing current registry contents rather than just referencing the registry. Section 4.3: * Interestingly, the entries for IPv4 are not capitalized (e.g., "interface address"), but they are for IPv6 (e.g., "Interface Address"). Section 6.3.2: * These two paragraphs read like they're in the wrong order. Sections 7.1 and 7.2: * These should refer back to Sections 4.2 and 4.3, respectively, where the new values are fully described. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
