Hi Martin,
On 09/06/2020 08:54, Martin Duke via Datatracker wrote:
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The link attributes are sub-sub-TLVs, but are sections 6 and 7 constantly refer
to them as “TLV types”, which seems imprecise.
well, sub-sub-TLV is a TLV and has a TLV type. I don't see a problem
with the existing language, but if you feel strongly, I can replace it
with "sub-sub-TLV types".
Nits:
S/other then/other than
fixed.
thanks,
Peter
Throughout this document, the indefinite and definite articles ‘a’, ‘an’, and
‘the’ are often missing where needed and present where not needed.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
