Rob - Thanx for your review. Inline.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:38 AM > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Acee > Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; aretana.i...@gmail.com; Acee Lindem > (acee) <a...@cisco.com> > Subject: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-te-app-14: (with > COMMENT) > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-isis-te-app-14: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm not sure whether this should really be a discuss ... I raised a similar > concern on the OSPF document as part of a discuss, and presume > consistency is > helpful. > > 4.1. Application Identifier Bit Mask > > UDABM Length: Indicates the length in octets (0-8) of the > User Defined Application Identifier Bit Mask. The length SHOULD > be the minimum required to send all bits which are set. > > User Defined Application Identifier Bits have no relationship to > Standard Application Identifier Bits and are not managed by IANA or > any other standards body. It is recommended that bits are used > starting with Bit 0 so as to minimize the number of octets required > to advertise all UDAs. > > In section 4.1, I think that the document should also add the sentence (taken > from the previous paragraph) "Bits that are not transmitted MUST be treated > as > if they are set to 0 on receipt." Note, that I also think that this behaviour > is implicitly required from the description of UDABM Length. > [Les:] I agree - but I think I will move/rewrite the sentence so that one instance indicates this applies to both SABM/UDABM. Les > Regards, > Rob > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
