Tony,
> On Jun 10, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Tony Przygienda <[email protected]> wrote: > > You do seem to be carrying as WG member a hot torch for area-proxy for some > reason, that's fine with me, frankly, I had extensive discussions with > customers when DriveNet was being proposed to them (which AFAIS is basically > area-proxy) and the solution is intriguing but it did not cut lots of > requirements of large customers and there are a lot of unresolved issues > operationally with an approach like that. Drivenets, as I understand it, is an attempt to physically deaggregate a multi-chassis fabric down to the chip level using a proprietary chip-set-specific cell based interlink protocol. However, it retains a single control plane and as such looks like a single IS-IS system. It has no relationship whatsoever to area proxy. Regards, Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
