I strongly support the adoption of the IS-IS TTZ draft. For the large scale network, if we just run the IS-IS in a large area, the LSDB will be very large. In addition, the convergence time will last for a long time. But TTZ is a good way to reduce the network size and the number of the Link state can be reduced largely.
BR, Rouxin ________________________________ From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of reta Yang <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 8:20 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ I support adoption of the IS-IS TTZ draft. It is very useful for the large network with abstracting a zone to a single virtual node. The size of the LSDB can be reduced dramatically. best, Reta ________________________________ From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Toy, Mehmet <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 8:06 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ I support adoption of the IS-IS TTZ draft. Mehmet
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
