I have reviewed the change in -10 and it seems fine to me. Objection withdrawn. I support publication.
Tony > On Aug 17, 2020, at 4:47 PM, tony...@tony.li wrote: > > > >> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for >> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/ > > > > Hi, > > I’d like to raise an objection. > > Recently, I requested (and I thought that Peter agreed to) a clarification of > the Min Unidirectional Link Delay. > > As of version -08, the draft references RFC 7810 for the Metric-type in > Section 5.1. > > That RFC defines both a “Unidirectional Link Delay” (section 4.1) and > “Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay” (section 4.2). > > I requested that the reference be extended to specify the section. > > Instead, as of -09, the reference has been changed to refer to > ietf-isis-te-app. This is somewhat helpful becuase it makes it clear that > this should be found > in the Application Specific Link Attributes Sub-TLV, but it still does not > resolve the ambiguity of which sub-sub-TLV should be used. > > I would again request that this be clarified. Proposed text: > > 1: Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in [RFC 7810], section 4.2, > encoded in the Application Specific Link Attributes Sub-TLV > [I-D.ietf-isis-te-app]. > > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Tony > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr