The WG adoption poll has completed.  There is both quite a bit of support for 
the document as well as some who have concerns for the necessity of the TTZ 
mechanisms. Given the support as well as the fact that the draft is 
experimental track, our reading is that we have sufficient basis for 
experimentation. As discussions of IS-IS area abstraction mechanisms have 
progressed, it has become apparent that we are not going to reach consensus on 
a single mechanism. It is our feeling that having multiple mechanisms adopted 
by the WG on the experimental track is preferable to WG paralysis.

Please republish the draft as draft-ietf-lsr-isis-ttz-00.txt with experimental 
status.

Acee and Chris



From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" 
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 10:17 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - 
draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt


Based on the discussions in the last meeting and on the mailing list regarding 
draft-chen-isis-ttz-11, the chairs feel that there are enough differences with 
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03 and in the community to consider advancing it 
independently on the experimental track.

These differences include abstraction at arbitrary boundaries and IS-IS 
extensions for smooth transition to/from zone abstraction.

We are now starting an LSR WG adoption call for draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt. 
Please indicate your support or objection to adoption prior to Tuesday, 
September 2nd, 2020.

Thanks,
Acee and Chris

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to