Hi Acee, I knew that there was an IPR disclosure on RFC 5316, since this is the bis version of that RFC, the IPR disclosure should apply to this draft as well. Except for that, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document.
Best regards, Mach From: Lsr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 10:50 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [Lsr] IPR Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02 Hi Mach, Les, Stefano, Xiaodong, Are you aware of any IPR associated with the subject draft. If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
