Hi authors, Here is one comment following the previous discussion on the mail list and the IETF meeting.
The IP Algorithm TLV is defined to advertise the IP Flex-Algorithm participation information, there is no separate TLV for IPv4 or IPv6 Flex-Algo participation. If some nodes participate in IPv4 Flex-Algo 128, and some of these nodes participate in IPv6 Flex-Algo 128, how to ensure that the path computed for IPv6 Flex-Algo will not use the nodes which only participate in IPv4 Flex-Algo 128? Best regards, Jie From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org> Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally support for WG adoption. This begins a two week WG adoption call. Please indicate your support or objection to WG adoption on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on December 16th, 2020. Also, review comments are certainly welcome. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
