Hi Acee,

We aren't generating any trap today for the subnet mismatch case. We wanted
to get some feedback on what would be an appropriate trap to generate from
a usability standpoint, if we want to generate one..

Regards,
Muthu

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:09 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Muthu,
>
> There isn’t a specific case for this specific error so I wouldn’t reuse
> the any of the specific ones with the trap. Like I said, some
> implementations don’t generate any OSPF MIB trap for this case. What are
> you doing today?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> *From: *Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <
> [email protected]>
> *Date: *Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 8:18 AM
> *To: *"Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Tulasi Rami Reddy N <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] RFC4750: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
>
>
>
> Hi Acee,
>
>
>
> This is a configuration error, right? Wouldn't ospfIfConfigError trap be
> more appropriate? There is no good error code for this case
> in ospfConfigErrorType, though. Perhaps, RFC4750 could have reserved some
> error codes for future definitions?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Muthu
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:16 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Tulasi,
>
> You definitely shouldn’t generate the netMaskMismatch trap as this is for
> mask mismatch detection on hello packets. You could generate the
> ospfIfRxBadPacket but many do not for this case.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> *From: *Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Tulasi Rami Reddy N <
> [email protected]>
> *Date: *Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 6:11 AM
> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] RFC4750: OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
>
>
>
> [ Sorry, My previous mail was truncated]
>
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> OSPFv2 adjacency will be formed on a numbered LAN only below both
> conditions are met:
>
>            1. Common IP subnet
>
>            2. Matching network mask.
>
> From the OSPFv2 MIB, there is only one error defined.
>
>
>
>      ospfConfigErrorType OBJECT-TYPE
>           SYNTAX       INTEGER {
>
>                           *netMaskMismatch (7),*
>            }
>
>
>
> I believe this is for the case 2 (when mask is mismatched).
>
>
>
> Let's take below example:
>
>
>
>   RTA    (11.1.1.2/24)   --------     (10.1.1.1/24) RTB
>
>
>
> Here, src IP is not matching to the Rx interface IP subnet, then what is
> the error type to be set?
>
> Should this be considered as generic input processing error and
> only generate
>
> *ospfIfRxBadPacket *notification or *netMaskMismatch  *notification?
>
> Should we need a new type here?
>
>
>
> "
>
> The generic input processing of OSPF packets will
>
> have checked the validity of the IP header and the OSPF packet
>
> header."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tulasi.
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:27 PM Tulasi Rami Reddy N <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> OSPFv2 adjacency will be formed on a numbered LAN only when
>
>            1. Common IP subnet
>
> 2.matching network mask.
>
> From the
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> TUlasi.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to