Thanks Peter - we will have a second WG Last Call on the new version of the draft. Acee
On 2/19/21, 7:08 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Peter Psenak" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Hi, these are larger, but important change and we would like the WG to review them. Changes are mostly OSPF specific, except the last item which is an editorial one. The changes include: 1. introduction of the OSPFv2 Extended Inter-Area ASBR LSA, OSPFv2 Extended Inter-Area ASBR TLV and OSPF Flexible Algorithm ASBR Metric Sub-TLV. These are used to advertise the FA specific inter-area metric for the ASBRs, similar to what the FAPM does for prefixes. We clearly missed these originally. 2. introduction of the E-bit in the OSPF OSPF FAPM Sub-TLV to support the OSPF external metric types for FA. This was also missed originally. 3. related clarifications in "Multi-area and Multi-domain Considerations" section related to the above. 4. updated IANA sections as a result of (1) and (2). 5. clarification of the ASLA usage in presence of the L-bit - this has been requested by Tony. No functional change, just an editorial change really. thanks, Peter On 19/02/2021 12:59, [email protected] wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. > > Title : IGP Flexible Algorithm > Authors : Peter Psenak > Shraddha Hegde > Clarence Filsfils > Ketan Talaulikar > Arkadiy Gulko > Filename : draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-14.txt > Pages : 44 > Date : 2021-02-19 > > Abstract: > IGP protocols traditionally compute best paths over the network based > on the IGP metric assigned to the links. Many network deployments > use RSVP-TE based or Segment Routing based Traffic Engineering to > steer traffic over a path that is computed using different metrics or > constraints than the shortest IGP path. This document proposes a > solution that allows IGPs themselves to compute constraint-based > paths over the network. This document also specifies a way of using > Segment Routing (SR) Prefix-SIDs and SRv6 locators to steer packets > along the constraint-based paths. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-14 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-14 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-14 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
