Dhruv -
Thanx for reviewing/supporting the draft. Please see inline. > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2021 2:09 AM > To: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> > Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-cha...@ietf.org>; teas-...@ietf.org; TEAS WG > (t...@ietf.org) <t...@ietf.org>; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; lsr- > a...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis > > Hi, > > I went through the diff with RFC5316. The changes look good. Some > minor comments - > > (1) Is it wise to use normative keywords MUST and SHOULD in the > appendix? The text is from section 3.1 but can it be reworded in the > appendix? Also wondering if other changes (IANA, nits) could be listed > or we could call it "major change" :) [Les:] I personally do not have an issue using the normative keywords in the Appendix. Not doing so I think might trigger someone to ask if there is some inconsistency between the Appendix text and the text in the body of the draft. 😊 If you know of some prohibition against using such keywords in an Appendix please provide the reference. The IANA change is a consequence of the introduction pf new IPv6 Local ASBR identifier sub-TLV. I do not see the need to mention it in the Appendix. I do not understand your comment about "major change". Could you explain? > > (2) IPv6 Local ASBR ID and IPv6 Router ID is used interchangeably i.e. > table in IANA section 6.2 does not use the same name as the table in > section 3.1 > [Les:] The use of " IPv6 Router ID" in Section 3.1 is inconsistent. I will fix that. Thanx for pointing that out. Les > Hope this helps! > > Thanks! > > Dhruv > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:00 PM Christian Hopps > <cho...@chopps.org<mailto:cho...@chopps.org>> > wrote: > > > > Hi LSR and TEAS, > > > > This begins a joint WG last call for: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/ > > > > Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March > 3, 2021. > > > > Authors, please indicate wether you are aware of any IPR related to this > document to the list. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris, Acee, (Lou and Pavan). > > _______________________________________________ > > Teas mailing list > > t...@ietf.org<mailto:t...@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org<mailto:Lsr@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
