OK, thanks. Approved. —John
On Apr 19, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi John, From: John Scudder <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 9:52 AM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: IANA <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Early IANA Allocation Request for "OSPF Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-02 Hi Acee, Have you determined that the requirements of RFC 7120 Section 2 are met? Yes – we hope to WG last call this draft as WG bandwidth permits. The same functionality has been implemented in IS-IS for some time. Thanks, Acee Thanks, —John P. S. As an aside, that’s a huuuge private use range in that registry. Any idea if it’s being made use of? Hard to imagine. On Apr 19, 2021, at 9:46 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi John, The authors have requested early IANA allocation for the subject draft to facilitate implementation. The suggested values are: This specification updates Link Local Signaling TLV Identifiers registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs/ospf-lls-tlvs.xhtml#ospf-lls-tlvs-1 The following values are requested for allocation: o TBD (Suggested value 19) - Reverse Metric TLV o TBD (Suggested value 20) - Reverse TE Metric TLV Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
